"Vote today in Zamora (and the rest of the districts is no different) means that, although you know that there are people far more worthy, prepared, or just nice, you'll have to settle for voting for the three caciquillos an exclusive list, lap dogs of the party leadership that it has placed in closed and blocked lists to thank the services provided and the assurance that the chambers will vote to dictation and never bother the ones in charge, despite knowing that Zamora worldwide, including a judge already issued a ruling, he knows and understands the business who have spent years making the shadow of power or putadas they have done since their companies to the public. Voting today means that only regions with sensitivities and parties who can manipulate it with de facto parliamentary representation as such regions, as well oversized for the absurd system of provincial constituencies. Voting today means that the tight control of the parliamentary groups for those who appoint its members means that the congressmen and senators do not serve the citizens but to the domes of [...]: parties representing citizens to requires the most basic constitutional theory does not exist. Voting today means that nothing will change in the political system, because to be a deputy must be pre-designated candidate, and this has to be subservient and not question too much (you know the quote classical theory in any textbook of contemporary politics: "that move does not appear in the photo" , and it is most certain). Voting today means accepting campaign designed to wasteful and primates, vote, without debate, vote not expected to have consequences. If something means to vote today, will only fuel the machines take to win votes of the parties, meet their share of power and ultimately make possible the designs of [...] those who directly or indirectly finance the parties and actually control policy since the election promises are not binding on the candidates elected and their commitment is with the citizenship. Perhaps this can be called democracy? The people's voice does not reach the courts. Voting today means to be an accomplice to the murder of Montesquieu and accept a flawed system.
"Still, I'd vote if someone [...] presented on its agenda an order to amend these services, even if not all or most of them. For a party that advocates a new electoral system that should be convened, with open lists, single constituency elections for Congress and for regional districts for the Senate, to territorial representation was genuine, and just as wide and regional election [...]; that was required by law a operation democratic parties and anything close to the primaries to choose candidates be mandatory and binding, and that election expenses were limited by law and be fully transparent. Yes vote for a party that raised a constitutional amendment to close the regional design in Spain: a fair and united federal state with powers pre-established and funding for the central and regional government, Congress and Senate for a real and shamefully not autonomous, a state, therefore, not subject to ongoing negotiation that is bleeding the treasury, impedes the progress of the nationalist tribal regions without touching the balls and Above all, avoid close once and for all a concept of Spain agreed and willingly accepted by all. A party to propose a real and not nominal separation of powers, that would not do to depend on the leadership of the party appointing the members of the Supreme Judicial Council or the Attorney General nor the members of the legislative chambers. In a game that rethink the state's relations with the Church [...]. In a match that would set its objectives at European level and not commercial, but global and United (I did not say charitable), and dignified addressed the problem of immigration. A party to question the consumerism that devours us and fouling mass phenomena yet the reprehensible that surrounds football and other sports and television [...]. [...] At a party, finally, leave the immediate electoral expediency and hypocrisy that goes with it and assume the historical mission of proclaiming the kingdom of ethics, modernizing Spain from its roots and not settle for a modern European varnish that room as soon as the economy was worse than today.
parties "[...] But, unfortunately, thrive in the party politics and I doubt that they can get traditional political hara-kiri for the democratization of the regime. I do not want a Messiah as Jesus Gil garrulous nor popular revolution it is not possible or desirable. I want a party of moderate and effective people (as are or may be actually the domes of the PSOE and PP) to renounce the electioneering and unprincipled power play and really want to jump into the political freedom of the English. What bothers me most is that we are not taking advantage of a broad freedoms, economic prosperity and political stability we have enjoyed as never to train citizens in a true democracy, develop the necessary reforms and intelligently appeal to solidarity and not charity, because we now numbs the mustachioed lullaby of sirens ( "Spain will Koha!, Spain Koha will !..." ), but when Spain goes wrong, all of a sudden we realize that this is not a true democracy and then there is no resources or patience to cope with change. "
or not it is is amazing ...? Digital Journalist.
0 comments:
Post a Comment